Are Quine’s criteria of adequacy for individuations unduly restrictive?
An important principle guiding Quine’s ontology consists in the rejection of ‘entities without identity’. It is used by him to reject intensional and merely possible entities. But Quine has never made explicit what the criteria are that a given sort of entities must meet in order to count as ‘well-i...
Main Author: | Greimann, Dirk |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | spa |
Published: |
Universidad de Costa Rica
2018
|
Online Access: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/35085 |
Similar Items
-
Do the Colleges of Journalists Restrict Freedom of Speech?
by: Barrantes Calderón, Victor J.
Published: (2008) -
The Semantic Significance of Frege’s Puzzle
by: Greimann, Dirk
Published: (2015) -
The Semantic Significance of Frege’s Puzzle
by: Greimann, Dirk
Published: (2015) -
Pesticides for restricted use in the United States are freely imported into Costa Rica
by: Vega, Sileny, et al.
Published: (1984) -
The Problems, Rhetorical and Grammatical, in the Teaching of That and Wich in Nonrestrictive and Restrictive Adjectival Clauses
by: Carlos Vargas, Juan, et al.
Published: (2004)