Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México

San Pedro River?s wetlands sustain trophic nets in the fluvial system, due to the high habitat availability, and space and temporal variations. In order to describe the relationship between environmental parameters and ichthyofauna, this study evaluated fish assemblages composition, distribution, ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castillo-Domínguez, Alfonso, Barba Macías, Everardo, de Jesús Navarrete, Alberto, Rodiles-Hernández, Rocío, de Lourdes Jiménez Badillo, María
Formato: Online
Idioma:spa
Publicado: Universidad de Costa Rica 2011
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/3133
id RBT3133
record_format ojs
institution Universidad de Costa Rica
collection Revista de Biología Tropical
language spa
format Online
author Castillo-Domínguez, Alfonso
Barba Macías, Everardo
de Jesús Navarrete, Alberto
Rodiles-Hernández, Rocío
de Lourdes Jiménez Badillo, María
spellingShingle Castillo-Domínguez, Alfonso
Barba Macías, Everardo
de Jesús Navarrete, Alberto
Rodiles-Hernández, Rocío
de Lourdes Jiménez Badillo, María
Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
author_facet Castillo-Domínguez, Alfonso
Barba Macías, Everardo
de Jesús Navarrete, Alberto
Rodiles-Hernández, Rocío
de Lourdes Jiménez Badillo, María
author_sort Castillo-Domínguez, Alfonso
description San Pedro River?s wetlands sustain trophic nets in the fluvial system, due to the high habitat availability, and space and temporal variations. In order to describe the relationship between environmental parameters and ichthyofauna, this study evaluated fish assemblages composition, distribution, abundance, density, biomass, richness species, diversity and equitability in the wetlands. Sampling considered three different sites and climatic seasons (dry, rainy and cold fronts). The physical and chemical parameters considered were dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, water transparency and the depth. Fishes were caught with a shrimp net, after six minutes towings and were identified afterwards. A total of 1 049 organisms of 25 fish species were caught, two of which were exotic species: Oreochromis niloticus and Parachromis managuense. A total of 23 species were found at site I (with the highest density 0.23ind./m2), 17 at site II (0.23ind./m2) and 14 at site III (0.12ind./m2). The dry season had the highest species number with 21 species, followed by the rainy season with 17 species, and the cold season with five species. Similarly, the highest biomass (8.30g/m2) was found in dry season, followed by the rainy (2.16g/m2) and the cold seasons (0.03g/m2). Considering seasons, highest density was found during the dry (0.436ind./m2), followed by the rainy (0.213ind./m2) and the cold (0.023ind./m2) seasons. The dominant density species during the study period, according to the quadrants graphic of Olmstead-Tukey were: Petenia splendida, Vieja heterospila, Vieja synspila, Dorosoma petenense and Astyanax aeneus. There were significant differences in the species richness among sites. Temperature, depth and transparency showed differences among the seasons. The canonical correspondence analysis indicated that fish distribution was governed by environmental parameters during all seasons. In terms of fish abundance and composition, environmental parameters play an important role showing spatial and temporal differences in the ecosystem, this could be explained with the fact that most of young fishes have a movement behavior to the wetlands, searching refuge and feed during the dry season. Considering the diversity indexes variation, it may be concluded that San Pedro River?s wetlands correspond to a system where the ichthyofauna composition fluctuates spatial and seasonally.
title Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
title_short Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
title_full Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
title_fullStr Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
title_full_unstemmed Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
title_sort ictiofauna de los humedales del río san pedro, balancán, tabasco, méxico
title_alt Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México
publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
publishDate 2011
url https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/3133
work_keys_str_mv AT castillodominguezalfonso ictiofaunadeloshumedalesdelriosanpedrobalancantabascomexico
AT barbamaciaseverardo ictiofaunadeloshumedalesdelriosanpedrobalancantabascomexico
AT dejesusnavarretealberto ictiofaunadeloshumedalesdelriosanpedrobalancantabascomexico
AT rodileshernandezrocio ictiofaunadeloshumedalesdelriosanpedrobalancantabascomexico
AT delourdesjimenezbadillomaria ictiofaunadeloshumedalesdelriosanpedrobalancantabascomexico
_version_ 1810114499830611968
spelling RBT31332022-06-06T18:56:43Z Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México Ictiofauna de los humedales del río San Pedro, Balancán, Tabasco, México Castillo-Domínguez, Alfonso Barba Macías, Everardo de Jesús Navarrete, Alberto Rodiles-Hernández, Rocío de Lourdes Jiménez Badillo, María biomass density dominance richness specific wetlands of the San Pedro River biomasa densidad dominancia riqueza específica humedales del río San Pedro San Pedro River’s wetlands sustain trophic nets in the fluvial system, due to the high habitat availability, and space and temporal variations. In order to describe the relationship between environmental parameters and ichthyofauna, this study evaluated fish assemblages composition, distribution, abundance, density, biomass, richness species, diversity and equitability in the wetlands. Sampling considered three different sites and climatic seasons (dry, rainy and cold fronts). The physical and chemical parameters considered were dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, water transparency and the depth. Fishes were caught with a shrimp net, after six minutes towings and were identi-fied afterwards. A total of 1 049 organisms of 25 fish species were caught, two of which were exotic species: Oreochromis niloticus and Parachromis managuense. A total of 23 species were found at site I (with the highest density 0.23ind./m2), 17 at site II (0.23ind./m2) and 14 at site III (0.12ind./m2). The dry season had the highest species number with 21 species, followed by the rainy season with 17 species, and the cold season with five species. Similarly, the highest biomass (8.30g/m2) was found in dry season, followed by the rainy (2.16g/m2) and the cold seasons (0.03g/m2). Considering seasons, highest density was found during the dry (0.436ind./m2), followed by the rainy (0.213ind./m2) and the cold (0.023ind./m2) seasons. The dominant density species dur-ing the study period, according to the quadrants graphic of Olmstead-Tukey were: Petenia splendida, Vieja heterospila, Vieja synspila, Dorosoma petenense and Astyanax aeneus. There were significant differences in the species richness among sites. Temperature, depth and transparency showed differences among the seasons. The canonical correspondence analysis indicated that fish distribution was governed by environmental parameters during all seasons. In terms of fish abundance and composition, environmental parameters play an important role showing spatial and temporal differences in the ecosystem, this could be explained with the fact that most of young fishes have a movement behavior to the wetlands, searching refuge and feed during the dry season. Considering the diversity indexes variation, it may be concluded that San Pedro River’s wetlands correspond to a system where the ichthyofauna composition fluctuates spatial and seasonally. San Pedro River?s wetlands sustain trophic nets in the fluvial system, due to the high habitat availability, and space and temporal variations. In order to describe the relationship between environmental parameters and ichthyofauna, this study evaluated fish assemblages composition, distribution, abundance, density, biomass, richness species, diversity and equitability in the wetlands. Sampling considered three different sites and climatic seasons (dry, rainy and cold fronts). The physical and chemical parameters considered were dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, water transparency and the depth. Fishes were caught with a shrimp net, after six minutes towings and were identified afterwards. A total of 1 049 organisms of 25 fish species were caught, two of which were exotic species: Oreochromis niloticus and Parachromis managuense. A total of 23 species were found at site I (with the highest density 0.23ind./m2), 17 at site II (0.23ind./m2) and 14 at site III (0.12ind./m2). The dry season had the highest species number with 21 species, followed by the rainy season with 17 species, and the cold season with five species. Similarly, the highest biomass (8.30g/m2) was found in dry season, followed by the rainy (2.16g/m2) and the cold seasons (0.03g/m2). Considering seasons, highest density was found during the dry (0.436ind./m2), followed by the rainy (0.213ind./m2) and the cold (0.023ind./m2) seasons. The dominant density species during the study period, according to the quadrants graphic of Olmstead-Tukey were: Petenia splendida, Vieja heterospila, Vieja synspila, Dorosoma petenense and Astyanax aeneus. There were significant differences in the species richness among sites. Temperature, depth and transparency showed differences among the seasons. The canonical correspondence analysis indicated that fish distribution was governed by environmental parameters during all seasons. In terms of fish abundance and composition, environmental parameters play an important role showing spatial and temporal differences in the ecosystem, this could be explained with the fact that most of young fishes have a movement behavior to the wetlands, searching refuge and feed during the dry season. Considering the diversity indexes variation, it may be concluded that San Pedro River?s wetlands correspond to a system where the ichthyofauna composition fluctuates spatial and seasonally. Universidad de Costa Rica 2011-06-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article Text application/pdf https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/3133 10.15517/rbt.v0i0.3133 Revista de Biología Tropical; Vol. 59 No. 2 (2011): Volume 59 – Regular number 2 – June 2011; 693–708 Revista de Biología Tropical; Vol. 59 Núm. 2 (2011): Volumen 59 – Número regular 2 – Junio 2011; 693–708 Revista Biología Tropical; Vol. 59 N.º 2 (2011): Volume 59 – Regular number 2 – June 2011; 693–708 2215-2075 0034-7744 10.15517/rbt.v0i0 spa https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/3133/3040 Copyright (c) 2011 Revista de Biología Tropical http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0