The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court
The Central American Court of Justice (CACJ) (1907-1918) was created with the goal of minimizing conflict between the five republics: El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Honduras. The CACJ, however, has attracted scant scholarly attention. Nonetheless, the Court is academically signi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online |
Idioma: | spa |
Publicado: |
Universidad de Costa Rica
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966 |
id |
DIALOGOS27966 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
DIALOGOS279662022-07-06T17:42:37Z The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court Ripley, Charles American Court of Justice regional organizations conflict peace The Central American Court of Justice (CACJ) (1907-1918) was created with the goal of minimizing conflict between the five republics: El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Honduras. The CACJ, however, has attracted scant scholarly attention. Nonetheless, the Court is academically significant and historically relevant. The CACJ was not only the world’s first supranational body to which states would suspend their sovereignty and submit all complaints, but also evidence that international organizations could facilitate state cooperation and create peace. Addressing the gap in the literature through extensive archival research, this study finds the following. First, the Court played an instrumental role in mediating regional peace and averting war between the republics. Second, it addressed controversial issues concerning state relations such as non-intervention, the law of the sea, and international treaty obligations. Third, due to the Court’s profound legal work, it still continues to have the potential to contribute to international law and institutions. Finally, although Washington played a significant role in the Court’s rise and demise, the Court demonstrates the ability of Latin American countries to address their own regional issues. As a result, the CACJ is a valuable underexplored subject that merits historical consideration. Universidad de Costa Rica 2017-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article historia archivistica text/html application/pdf application/epub+zip application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966 10.15517/dre.v19i1.27966 Diálogos. Revista Electrónica de Historia; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018); 47-68 Diálogos. Revista Electrónica de Historia; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2018); 47-68 Diálogos; Vol. 19 N.º 1 (2018); 47-68 1409-469X 2215-3292 spa https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966/31243 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966/31251 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966/31253 https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966/35374 Derechos de autor 2017 Charles Ripley |
institution |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
collection |
Revista Electrónica de Historia |
language |
spa |
format |
Online |
author |
Ripley, Charles |
spellingShingle |
Ripley, Charles The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court |
author_facet |
Ripley, Charles |
author_sort |
Ripley, Charles |
description |
The Central American Court of Justice (CACJ) (1907-1918) was created with the goal of minimizing conflict between the five republics: El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Honduras. The CACJ, however, has attracted scant scholarly attention. Nonetheless, the Court is academically significant and historically relevant. The CACJ was not only the world’s first supranational body to which states would suspend their sovereignty and submit all complaints, but also evidence that international organizations could facilitate state cooperation and create peace. Addressing the gap in the literature through extensive archival research, this study finds the following. First, the Court played an instrumental role in mediating regional peace and averting war between the republics. Second, it addressed controversial issues concerning state relations such as non-intervention, the law of the sea, and international treaty obligations. Third, due to the Court’s profound legal work, it still continues to have the potential to contribute to international law and institutions. Finally, although Washington played a significant role in the Court’s rise and demise, the Court demonstrates the ability of Latin American countries to address their own regional issues. As a result, the CACJ is a valuable underexplored subject that merits historical consideration. |
title |
The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court |
title_short |
The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court |
title_full |
The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court |
title_fullStr |
The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Central American Court of Justice (1907-1918): Rethinking the Word’s First Court |
title_sort |
central american court of justice (1907-1918): rethinking the word’s first court |
publisher |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/dialogos/article/view/27966 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ripleycharles thecentralamericancourtofjustice19071918rethinkingthewordsfirstcourt AT ripleycharles centralamericancourtofjustice19071918rethinkingthewordsfirstcourt |
_version_ |
1805406243627466752 |